Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JRF's avatar

Thank you for going into more detail about your discipline of silence.

Expand full comment
Dan Segal's avatar

An update: tonight I heard your Faithful Presence sermon. Of course you don’t actually cite James Davison Hunter, although I believe he is the originator of the phrase, which you possibly picked up from him. But to your credit you don’t charge Christians who want “to change the world” with being motivated by hate, having a Nietzschean ‘ressentiment’ and will to power.

In fact you come across as very kind and caring, solicitous of the concerns of your congregation.

Still I must stand by everything, or virtually everything, I wrote, because good people (as people go), kind, helpful people can still do a lot of damage. Oh, I don’t view your sermon and your piece here on Substack as necessarily destructive, but I do see the potential there yes.

Certainly your heart exam is worthy, we need to not make tertiary or secondary things primary. But by categorizing literal life and death struggles for civilization as simply politics is, in my view, to trivialize the stakes. Was the Obama Administration’s prosecution, persecution of innocent Catholic nuns (who’d merely declined to be complicit in artificial contraception and abortion) just “politics?” Were those who fought to defend their First Amendment right to Free Exercise of Religion similarly just engaging in politics?

I get it, you want your church to welcome and affirm everyone to the extent possible. But that would seem to require the continued existence of your church! Do you not perceive the threat to religious freedom? President Obama’s Chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Martin Castro sounded remarkably like certain other Castros, saying that

“Religion is being used as both a weapon and a shield by those seeking to deny others equality…the phrases ‘religious liberty’ and ‘religious freedom’ will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, or any form of intolerance.”

Meanwhile in 2016, Planned Parenthood urged us to vote for Secretary Clinton, offering in one advertisement

“3 Damn Good

Reasons to Support

Hillary Clinton

-She introduced 8 pieces of legislation with the purpose of expanding and protecting access to reproductive health care - no other candidate has introduced any.

-She's the most outspoken and frequent supporter of Planned Parenthood - and the only candidate to speak up for Planned Parenthood at the debates.

- She's the only candidate who has testified before a Congressional committee on how abortion is an essential part of reproductive health care.”

Now, can you point to serious GOP problems? I certainly can, for example the newfound Republican enthusiasm for IVF treatments.

But your diminishing of what you’re calling politics may yet deprive the world of a worthy crusader from your own church. You may have sitting in your pews or here on Substack (your virtual congregation) the next Wilberforce or Martin Luther King. They may be keen to devote their lives to moral and legal reform—until their own pastor pours cold water on this idea, telling them in effect to back off, to sit down and be quiet, because otherwise a focus on politics would necessarily pose a threat to their spiritual life.

Is it not possible that some people’s Christian life is quite properly centered around politics, as the lives of others are spent in hardware stores or behind the wheel of a big truck?

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts